Main / Music / United States V Mondragon Santiago.pdf
United States V Mondragon Santiago.pdf download
26 Mar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE MONDRAGON- SANTIAGO,. Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Laredo U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G. or Guidelines). We affirm Mondragon-Santiago's. 1 May v. ANN JEFFERSON,. Defendant – Appellant,. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. Before STEWART, Chief .. the Guidelines range is presumed reasonable on appeal.” United States v. Mondragon–Santiago, F.3d , (5th Cir. ). Here, Jefferson. 5 Jan is foreclosed by United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, F.3d , ( 5th Cir. ). Although Garcia concedes that this court applies plain error review when a defendant fails to object to the reasonableness of the sentence in the district court, he nevertheless contends that the proper standard of.
3 Jan UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS JORGE HERNANDEZ TAMAYO, also known as Luis Jorge Hernandez, also known as Luis Hernandez, also known as Luis Jorg Hernandez,. Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court Mondragon-Santiago, F.3d. ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL. LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER. Rod Blagojevich,. Petitioner, v. UNited StateS,. Respondent. Courtney M . olIva United States v. Lynn,. F.3d (4th Cir. ) United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,. F.3d (5th Cir. ). 18 Mar In , in Texas state court, Defendant-Appellant Nino Rodriguez score under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) ' 4A(k), which 69; United States v. Arias, F. App=x , (5th Cir. ) (unpublished). (applying Mondragon-Santiago and reasoning that revocation of a deferred.
16 May United. States v. Mondragon-Santiago, F.3d , (5th Cir. ) ( quotingMares,. F.3d at ). Even assuming the district court plainly erred, any error did not affect. Tang's substantial rights. We acknowledge the Sixth Circuit recently held a district court's plain error in failing to state the reasons. 17 Jan United States Court of Appeals,. Fifth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar MONDRAGON, Defendant-Appellant. No. Summary Calendar. Aug. 14, Background: Defendant was convicted in the. United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of Texas of. 9 Dec (a)(48)(A) of the Act. United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, F.3d. , (5th Cir. ) (“Federal law counts Texas's deferred adjudication probation as a conviction.”); Matter of Punu, 22 I&N Dec. , (BIA. ) (holding that a deferred adjudication under article , section 5(a) of the.